PENERAPAN METODE FUZZY AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) SEBAGAI SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN DOSEN TERBAIK (Studi Kasus : STMIK PRINGSEWU)
Abstract
In the decision making of tertiary institutions, there are still many who still use methods that do not yet have a fair principle, for example is the acceptance of lecturers who do not use the selection process and not in accordance with their competencies, and in promotions or positions they still often use collusion and nepotism. In this way it will definitely hamper progress in a college. The above problems can be classified in the MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) problem because it involves several criteria in determining the best lecturer among a number of existing lecturers. AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) is an excellent Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method in modeling the opinions of experts in decision support systems. Based on the discussion that has been described, namely regarding Appraisal of Lecturer Performance with the Fuzzy Analythic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, the performance degradation uses Fuzzy Analythic Hierarchy Process (AHP), namely: Lecturer attendance, length of teaching according to credits, Timeliness of gathering questions, Accuracy of grades Collected, Seminars and Workshops, Research, Community Service, Student Questionnaire and by using the Fuzzy Analysis Thierarchy Process (AHP) The process of reducing the criteria of existing data is better, so that it can produce the right criteria for the calculation of Lecturer Performance at Pringsewu STMIK.
Downloads
References
[2] Afifiah, S. N., & Wicaksana, E. J. (2014). Persepsi Mahasiswa tentang Mata Kuliah Statistik serta Pengaruhnya terhadap Prestasi Belajar Statistik Mahasiswa IKIP PGRI Madiun. Jurnal Care.
[3] Dorian, M., & şuluţiu, O. (1976). Jurnal.BooksAbroad.https://doi.org/10.2307/40130800
[4] Emrouznejad, A., & Ho, W. (2017). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315369884
[5] Hasugian, A. H., & Cipta, H. (2018).Pengertian Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informatika.
[6] Indriartoro, N., & Supomo, B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, Cetakan Kedua. In Yogyakara; Penerbit BFEE UGM.
[7] Khazaii, J., & Khazaii, J. (2016) Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In Advanced Decision Making for HVAC Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33328-1_9
[8] Kosasi, S., & Yuliani, I. D. A. E. (2014). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Sales Promotion Girl. Eksplora Informatika.
[9] Kousalya, P., Mahender Reddy, G., Supraja, S., & Shyam Prasad, V. (2012). Analytical Hierarchy Process approach – An application of engineering education. Mathematica Aeterna. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.06.036
[10] Kusrini, M. K. (2007). Konsep Dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. In Penerbit Andi.Kusumadewi, S. H. (2006). Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Graha Ilmu Yogyakarta.
[11] Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioǧlu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044
[12] Manullang. (1991). Manajemen Personalia. Ghalia Indonesia.
[13] Manurung, S. (2018). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN GURU DAN PEGAWAI TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE MOORA. Simetris: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro Dan Ilmu Komputer. https://doi.org/10.24176/simet.v9i1.1967
[14] Mardalis, A. (2005). Meraih Loyalitas Pelanggan. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis BENEFIT. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
[15] Prasetyaningrum, I. D. (2009). Kepuasan Mahasiswa dan Loyalitas Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Pada Undaris Ungaran). In thesis.
[15] Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5
[16] Sagala, R. dan. (2016). Landasan Teori. Landasanteori.Com.
[17] Samvedi, A., Jain, V., & Chan, F. T. S. (2013). Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330 Siagian. (2018). Pengaruh
[18] Komunikasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Dimediasi Oleh Kepuasan Ker/Ja. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5183.7283
[19] Simon, H. A. (2012). The Architecture of Complexity. In The Roots of Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27922-5_23
[20] Sugiyono. (2008). Pengerian data sekunder. In Metode Penelitian bisnis. Sugiyono. (2015). Pengertian Dokumentasi (fix). Biomass Chem Eng.
[21] Suryadi, K. (2007). Key Performance Indicators Measurement Model Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Trend-Comparative Dimension in Higher Education Institution. International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP2007).
[22] Sutapa, I. N. (2002). Aplikasi Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process. Juranal Teknik Industri.
[23] Taylan, O., Bafail, A. O., Abdulaal, R. M. S., & Kabli, M. R. (2014). Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Applied Soft Computing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003
[24] Turban. (2017). Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[25] Wedan, M. (2016). Pengertian Pendidikan dan Tujuan Pendidikan Secara Umum. Silabus.
